So, we should have at least one "generic" bounty hunter. This also makes it useful since you, dear reader, are unlikely to need a bounty hunter who specializes in hunting Witch Cats. Thus, of the three-ish hunters I've proposed this week, this is the one you're most likely to actually use.
But what to do? Every hunter needs a schtick, and our first one already melds excess collateral damage with precision planning. Our second one melds melee excellence with a sympathetic character. Every hunter should feel different enough that they represent a unique challenge for the PC, so ours should feel different.
Well! I've been discussing Bounty Hunters with some of my Patrons, and Gentleman Gamer suggested that most bounty hunters are "either bosses or groups of mooks." I corrected him on the latter: you're unlikely to see a group of mooks. "Why?" he asked. Well, the real reason is that we expect to see highly competent loners doing these tasks, and that it's hard to pay an entire crew off of the sorts of bounties most people collect. But that just means its rare, so why not have a bounty hunter with a group of mooks at his disposal? It offers some unique opportunities: when searching for the character, his posse can canvas an area as a group and when they close in for the kill (er, capture), they can "beat" the target towards the primary hunter, like dogs in a hunt. Gentleman Gamer went on to muse about drones, robot dogs and Shinjurai hunters, and I'm not going to dismiss any of those as ideas. There's an entire world of hunters we could be making. I'm going to focus, for now, on a guy who uses human mooks to help him fight.
How to fight, like, literally everyone
So, we need one last hunter who uses a group of allies to help assist in his defeat of his target. This suggests a few traits already that should help differentiate him from the other hunter's we've had so far. Mainly, what sort of hunter is it that has a bunch of people helping him? Such a hunter might lack the skills to do it himself, or he might prefer to have an audience, or he might be highly organized and runs his hunts like a business that he brings partner onto. I'm going to push more for the former two (especially since our hunter is worth no more than the 300 points that Xerxes is worth): he's not that great of a hunter on his own, and he likes a bit of an audience. That said, he'll make good use of his minions: they'll make noise, push and chase the target and drive them into an ambush by our primary hunter.This suggests some traits:
- Ally Group: Obviously, our hunter needs a group of hunters to assist him. I would say at least 5, but probably no more than 20. These would be mooks, of course, their BAD associated with his BAD, but likely between BAD 2 and BAD 5.
- Nothing without his minions: Our hunter should be at a heavy penalty when he's lost his troops. He might have a trait like Chummy to represent this: if you can defeat enough of his mooks, he'll retreat.
- Kind of a Dick: This is a hunter who sends "wave after wave of his own men" after the target, so he's probably a bit egocentric, and he claims the lion's share of the bounty once the mark has been taken, so he's also probably selfish. I had mentioned yesterday that having an NPC that the players will relish defeating can be fun. This might be such a character. I see braggadocio in the character.
- Charisma and Good Looks: I picture Captain Laser from "I'm not a Monster." This character needs to attract people willing to accept low pay for a high risk profession. He needs to be the sort of guy who talks the 10 campers into jumping the bear, claiming "only some of you will die," and then claim to be the one who killed the bear. You need to have a nice smile and a lot of charm to pull that off.
- Command and Coordination: This is not a solo hunter who traps targets through cunning and research, but a middle manager who uses his employees to do the hard work for him, but that requires him to know how to get the most out of them. That suggests Leadership and Tactics.
- Ambush: If he's going to have his minions make noise and drive your target towards you, you need to know how to take advantage of that. He's likely a skilled ambusher, which mean he needs Stealth.
- Non-Lethal Take Downs: He's likely the sort that wants to look like a hero, so he'd rather have a photo op getting a mark to do the perp walk than he would showing up at the bounty collection office with a body bag. Thus, he'd likely favor stunners and stun grenades, and perhaps good old fisticuffs, for taking his target down.
- Media Attention: If you're good looking, trying to present yourself as a hero (to get more gullible mooks to join you), then it helps to have great media presence. It might also make a valid tactic to beat out the target from hiding: set yourself up as a glamorous bounty hunter, do some interviews about your latest target, offer a modest reward for information leading to the capture of this "dangerous fugitive," (a tiny percentage of the award, obviously, like "Here's 20 credits, thanks kid") and otherwise plaster the area with holo-posters of your target. That lets you turn Propaganda into a research skill and get everyone else to do your work for you, which seems to be this guys schtick.
This is a great post. I'll absolutely use some of it. It's good general and specific advice on how to make an entertaining and engaging NPC.
ReplyDeleteI'll echo you on NPCs who are fun to defeat. My last campaign had one, who just rubbed the players the wrong way. They got to tangle with him a few times, along with his fellows (basically, an anti-party). All of the encounters were non-lethal, but they kept talking about when they'd finally get to make the encounter lethal. It was without the usual "We'll just kill that NPC and move on without looking at him or engaging with him as anything more than just a bag of HP to be stabbed in the eye" that I find so common and disappointing in game. It let me have the fun of playing an entertaining NPC and the PCs appreciate getting to tangle with him and defeat him. It's a tough thing to pull off, though.